政治哲学工作坊第三十九讲:非同一性抑或交往行为?重思阿多诺与哈贝马斯

Political Philosophy Workshop (39th)
Organizer
Department of Philosophy (Zhuhai),Sun Yat-sen University
Topic
Non-Identity or Communicative Action? Reconsidering Adorno and Habermas (Virtual)
Speaker
Eric NELSON,
Professor, Division of Humanities, University of Copenhagen, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Moderator
Jun-Hyeok KWAK,
Professor, Department of Philosophy (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-sen University
Time
Dec. 8. 2021 15:00
// ABSTRACT
Jürgen Habermas declared the philosophy of his teacher Theodor W. Adorno to be a dead-end after his death and developed his own theory of normativity and communicative action in confrontation with what he perceived to be the failures of Adorno’s critical social theory. This paper, informed by arguments made in my recent 2020 book on Adorno and Levinas, will offer a reevaluation of the continuing critical and radical potential of Adorno’s conception of critical models, the domination of nature, normative minimalism, restrictive and responsive forms of mimesis, dissonance and non-identity, and the materiality of the other in light of the critique and normatively-oriented alternative developed by Habermas. I will examine ways in which Adorno’s heuristic critical models, analysis of the domination of nature, and ethics of non-identity are more appropriate under contemporary crisis conditions than the strong anthropocentric normative model of communicative participation advocated in Habermas.
政治哲学工作坊第三十九讲
主办
中山大学哲学系(珠海)
主题
非同一性抑或交往行为?
重思阿多诺与哈贝马斯
主讲
Eric NELSON
香港科技大学人文学院教授
主持
Jun-Hyeok KWAK (郭峻赫)
中山大学哲学系(珠海)教授
时间
2021年12月08日15:00
地点
腾讯会议
摘要
尤尔根·哈贝马斯断言他的老师西奥多·阿多诺的哲学,在其故去之后便陷入僵局。哈贝马斯直面那些被他视为阿多诺理论的未竟之处,发展出自己的规范性交往行为理论。本讲受到我于2020年出版的、有关阿多诺和列维纳斯的书中论证的启发。鉴于哈贝马斯发展的以规范性和批判性为导向的替代理论,本讲将重新评价阿多诺一些仍然潜在具有批判性和根本性的概念,包括:批判模式、支配自然、规范极简主义、限制形式与响应形式的模仿、不和谐与非同一性,以及“他者”的物质性。我将考察在当代危机境况下,何以阿多诺启发式的批判模式、对自然支配的分析,以及非同一性的伦理学,比哈贝马斯所主张的强人类中心主义的、规范性交往参与模式更加恰当。